Am putting together bits & pieces of my bio for Jane Kerschner, my well-being coach (praise be for the blessings of Skype & phone, since she is outside D.C. while I'm over the border from Philadelphia).
Years ago, I heard Marianne Williamson say that if we all took down our masks, we'd realize how alike we all are. I quite agree, because family secrets only make us feel isolated - like we're the only one(s) who messes up, like other people are relatively flawless - & because I believe in my heart that all of us did our best with what we had. That being said, here goes.
DEEV's (Elsa Beth Lockhart Murphy)
totally subjective autobiography*
SIBLINGS
I am the youngest of five children. My surviving siblings are Peter, who’s 77,
and Mike, who’s 74. Mim, my only sister,
died this past July, at 71. Ian was
killed in 1959, at age 11. I turn 64
tomorrow.
Several interesting dynamics tie back to that 8, 10
& 14 year age difference.
First, there’s the difference itself – all of them
shared years in the same small elementary school, went every morning to the
same building, shared the same teachers.
When Peter went onto high school, it was right next door to Mike &
Mim’s school. Not just next door –
connected by a walk way.
They all frolicked in the creek & enjoyed swimming
activities in the pond, both deemed polluted in the mid-1950s & replaced
with a community swimming pool. Mike
followed Peter as a sport star in high school, both were proud that Mim was a
great softball player. They were aware
of each other as children, interacted, shared childhood memories.
All three of them graduated before the Kennedy
assassination. I graduated the year
after the Summer of Love.
They were
rooted in the unquestioning ‘50s; my feet were planted firmly in the
Therapeutic Age.
They were all older than Ian; I was the only one
younger.
Peter & Mim are both non-verbal, while Mike was garrulous.
Peter was always full of himself, certain of his
superiority – the family joked that he thought that a prince had been switched
with a changeling at birth, that he was the prince & we were the
changeling’s family; Mike was hyper
social, outgoing & class clownish;
Mim was quiet, reserved, super shy, leery of others, inspiring a strong
sense of protectiveness.
From an early age, I was struck with how all three
seemed to lack any genuine sense of self-confidence. Well, Mike might have had a natural sense of
self-confidence, but Peter took care of that, just as Mim did with me.
Ian was a tender-hearted boy. He loved animals & they loved him back,
reading, helping others. He could have
been friends with anyone, but chose to be best friends with possibly the most troubled boy in his class.
Mom said that when she was sick & in bed when we
headed out for school, Mike, Ian & I would always stop in first to see if
she needed anything; Peter & Mim
tried to get out the door without being noticed.
PARENTS
Raymond (Pete) Lewis Lockhart & Katharine Reynolds Lockhart
I started with my siblings, because Peter & Mim –
not Mom & Dad - were the dominant forces in the family.
My parents were a devoted, tenderly loving couple. And they were a bust at being parents. Those two observations are closely tied
together. Both were in their teens when
they lost an adored other-sex parent; both were left with a horror story in
the surviving mother or father.
Dad’s mother died when he was 14. My paternal grandmother was RHneg. As often happened in the early 1900s, the
first child survived while the others were delivered but died soon after. Dad was the first born. His mother bore several children after him; all died soon after delivery. Lillian herself died soon after giving birth.
Although doctors said her death was due to complications following childbirth, Dad believed his beloved mother died of a broken heart. Gar, his father, was having an affair. It wasn’t open, but Lillian knew. So did Dad.
A year after Lillian died, Gar married his mistress, Dad’s stepmother. Small wonder Dad swore he’d be
a loving, loyal & supportive husband, which he was to his early death, at
63.
Mom’s father died when she was 19. From what I can piece together, he'd been declining for several years with disease - Mom recalled being in her mid-teens when he switched from the violin to the autoharp, which could be played on his lap (less risk of
heart attack).
This part is funky, so
bear with me. When Mom was a high school
senior & her baby sister was a sophomore, the girls lived in Bryn
Athyn (PA), as their father had long planned, going to a private school. They lived in a rented house, where until near the end their father was tended by the community nurse. Her mother was back home in Baltimore, doing her best to hold onto their father’s job as
an estate manager for a local wealthy family.
To her dying day, Mom talked about helping care for her father as an
honor – she adored him, his tender nature & loving spirit.
When my grandfather died in 1929, the family moved in
with my grandmother’s father, in the Germantown section of Philadelphia. Mom &
Aunt Betty went from living in their Baltimore home, from their occasional home in Bryn Athyn - homes filled with music & merriment - to living
in an unfamiliar neighborhood, in a strict Methodist household. No card playing, no dancing, absolutely no
drinking. No fun.
After her father's death, Mom was the person my
grandmother turned to for support. The
consequences were disastrous. I can’t
say it was all due to Gran, but she played a huge role in Mom’s view of herself
as worthless, a view she transferred later to me. The woman was a horror. Until Mom’s final years, when she was more
open to seeing things as they appeared to be rather than as she wished them,
Mom never slammed Gran, but her “humorous” stories told their own tale.
I was blessed to have collaborating testimony
from Miss Phoebe Bostock, who was quite old when I cleaned houses in college,
who shared her images of my grandparents over cups of tea & cookies between
washing floors & changing sheets.
Miss Phoebe had been the community nurse, so she knew plenty! My cousin, Peggy, was another source of
collaborating information – as I learned after Mom died, Gran had dirty
dealings with Peggy’s father, in exactly the same way she stole Mom’s wedding
money.
The way I see it, Mom had to make her mother's horrific
behavior (just the other night, Peter, described Gran, a woman I never knew, as “evil”)
acceptable, because there was no getting away from her. Mom – the 4th youngest of 5 – had
sole responsibility for her mother until Gran’s death in 1955. The only way she could make it work was to
make what Gran did okay.
What does it
say that taking that approach worked for all of Gran’s life, but soon after she
died, Mom had a breakdown that required weeks & weeks of hospitalization at a mental
hospital, with treatment involving shock therapy.
Just let that sink in.
Burying her natural feelings about Gran’s unspeakable nature helped keep
Mom stay on an artificial even keel during Gran’s lifetime, but once she was
gone, she fell apart.
Over the time Mom was hospitalized & recovering, the
five children were farmed out to five different families. Until this morning, hadn't thought about the
impact that must have had on the older kids, especially on Peter, Mike &
Mim, who were 18, 14, & 12 at the time.
Their mother in the loony bin (which was how it was thought of back
then) while they were separated from each other & their father. Staggering.
Mom was genuinely her best self with Dad. I totally understand. Dad saw in Mom what John saw in me – a better
self we never imagined. Mom’s challenge
was that once Dad died, so did her good opinion of herself. Until she was in her late 80s, when she came
to have greater faith in herself & a clearer view of what was happening
around her, Mom continued to see what she wanted, not what was right in front
of her.
My sister-in-laws were united in telling Mom that she’d
fantasized her relationship with Dad, that he’d actually
dominated & her true role had been as submissive female. Seems to me that they couldn't recognize a
genuine partnership when it was right in front of them, because that is what my
parents had. They were, to steal from
Paul Child speaking to Julia, the butter to each other’s bread. They were from the moment they met. I can understand, because John & I have
much the same relationship – except indelible.
Dad saw in Mom something she never imagined,
while she did the same with him. They
both sought to have a true partnership within their marriage &
most who knew them would say they succeeded.
Dad was a far better parent than Mom, but even he had
his head in the clouds when it came to Mim.
Mim could do no wrong. Dad always
took her word over Mom’s, certainly over mine.
As I experienced it, Dad loved Mim sentimentally, while I had his
respect. Praise be, I'll always take earning someone’s respect to automatically having their affection.
Most people think of me as being like my
mother, but I am actually my father’s daughter – and proud of it. He was a clear thinker, could see something
unpleasant without falling to pieces. He
actually disciplined me – with good cause – twice, something Mom could never
have done.
Mom’s way of dealing with family unpleasantness was to
either tune it out, retranslate it into something acceptable to her core
beliefs, or literally leave the room. If
something turned out in a way she hadn’t expected, she simply forgot it had
happened. Went clean out of her
mind. She either remembered it in a way
that never happened or it simply never happened at all.
Fascinating, in an appalling way.
Although both Mom & Dad basically threw Mike &
me to the wolves, the ones they really didn’t serve well as parents were Peter
& Mim, both gifted people who ended up with spectacularly wretched
lives. My sister died destitute, basically
a ward of the state. Peter is not much better off. These are the two who always & forever were held up by themselves & our parents as exemplars of what Mike & I could
only, in our best dreams, dream of
being. Which was always & forever
the opposite of reality.
Between Peter, Mim & our parents, Mike & I were
pretty well beaten down in our expectations of ourselves. I was the luckier of the two – being the much
younger sister, I could see the effect on Mike, who was clearly more
intelligent & talented than portrayed.
But he fell for it – hook, line & sinker.
Peter’s wife summed it up perfectly when she
observed to me, “Peter & Mim are the smart ones, while you & Mike are
the social ones.” Which I translated as
they were intelligent while Mike & I were dim bulbs. And that was how we were seen & treated
within the family.
Tragically, it was
also how we saw & treated ourselves.
Neither Mike nor I made any effort in school. Why bother?
We already knew we’d fail.
Because we never gave our work any effort, we never discovered that we
were actually very intelligent. Intentionally
or not, Peter, Mim & our parents mentally & emotionally kneecapped both
of us.
Bottom line: I
can mentally & even emotionally understand how wildly ridiculous it is to see
myself as incapable of attaining mediocrity let alone greatness, but that was
part of my warp & woof for DECADES.
Time & time & time again, my experience says I am bright, capable & accomplished, with a host of quantifiable achievements
from years teaching & in the corporate world. Time & time again, my ability to connect
& work with others - children & adults, students & clients - brought me accolades, advancement & even pretty nifty rewards. But something deep deep deep inside my
tissues still RESISTS making the effort to do the things that most call out to
be done.
It just dawned on me, writing this. I don’t need help uncovering the pathology of
my problem. I don’t need support in
believing I am capable & worthy of achieving more, much more. I don’t need a life coach – I have a life
& in most ways it’s happy & rewarding.
I need a well-being coach, someone by my side as I take the final steps
down into the root cellar where my truest self has been waiting all this time. I need Jane Kerschner.
* I tried to stay as close to objective as possible, to flag where it's my opinion or assessment.
Thank You Elsa!
ReplyDelete